 |
mike
Avg. Weekly Miles: 50
Avg. Training Pace: 7.5/mile
Years Running:
Pronation: Overpronate
Shoe Weight Pref: Racing Flats
Shoe Toebox Pref: Moderate
Weight: 205 pounds
Gender: Male
| Good but not great
(2009-07-29) |
Rating
 | Plus: Lightweight,cushioning, innovative design, cool look.
Minus: Flywire is unforgiving which eliminates too many foot instep sizes,though seamless; socks are advised, over-all fit is hampered due to unforgiving material.
(Write a review) (Reply to this review) |
|
|
micke
Avg. Weekly Miles: 55
Avg. Training Pace: 7.0/mile
Years Running:
Pronation: Neutral
Shoe Weight Pref: Light-weight Trainers
Shoe Toebox Pref: Moderate
Weight: 163 pounds
Gender: Male
| too soft and undefined
(2009-03-25) |
Rating
 | I tried this shoe out for a while and didn't like it. It's too soft and undefined when the foot hits the ground. Further it doesn't provide much support. For an overview of this and other racing flats from Adidas, Nike, Asics, Saucony, New Balance, Brooks and Puma, see
http://www.400days.net/?p=1109
(Write a review) (Reply to this review) |
|
|
stepandafend
Avg. Weekly Miles: 60
Avg. Training Pace: 6.5/mile
Years Running: 3
Pronation: Overpronate
Shoe Weight Pref: Light-weight Trainers
Shoe Toebox Pref: Narrow
Weight: 115 pounds
Gender: Male
| Stepandafends appraisal of a shoe
(2008-12-11) |
|
|
Steve
Avg. Weekly Miles: 65
Avg. Training Pace: 7.0/mile
Years Running: 3
Pronation: Neutral
Shoe Weight Pref: Light-weight Trainers
Shoe Toebox Pref: Narrow
Weight: 144 pounds
Gender: Male
| great flat, but don't expect it to last.
(2008-11-30) |
Rating
 | These are great racing flats, but like I said in the title, don't expect them to last too long. Save them for race day and you will be happy.
(Write a review) (Reply to this review) |
|
|
mehunt
Avg. Weekly Miles: 75
Avg. Training Pace: 6.5/mile
Years Running: 24
Pronation: Neutral
Shoe Weight Pref: Medium-weight Trainers
Shoe Toebox Pref: Moderate
Weight: 155 pounds
Gender: Male
| Fantastic long distance racer
(2008-10-31) |
Rating
 | Probably the best long distance racing shoe currently on the market. I ran a half marathon in these last weekend, loved them. Would see no problem with running a full marathon in them. Also ran a 4mi in them, and was less of a fan of them for short distances. I like a more low-profile, responsive shoe for shorter races. But for threshold runs, and long races I don\'t think there is a better shoe out there.
(Write a review) (Reply to this review) |
|
|
Mr. Marathon
Avg. Weekly Miles: 90
Avg. Training Pace: 7.0/mile
Years Running: 4
Pronation: Neutral
Shoe Weight Pref: Light-weight Trainers
Shoe Toebox Pref: Narrow
Weight: 152 pounds
Gender: Male
| Wow!
(2008-10-28) |
Rating
 | These shoes are truly amazing. They are very responsive and have great energy return. I ran 10 miles with them as soon as I got them home. I felt fast and had a great run. The LunaRacers are one of the best racing flats I've ever had.
(Write a review) (Reply to this review) |
|
|
|
Write your review of the Nike LunaRacer+ |
Women's
Men's
