Software
The software that runs on the Forerunner 201 (a.k.a. firmware)
is well thought out and intuitive. Most people with a basic
understanding of software interfaces will easily be able to
figure out how to operate the Forerunner without reading the
manual. (For the rest of us, the manual is detailed and easy
to follow.) Menu functions, prompts, and other controls are
easy to understand.
Garmin has been very good about
providing updates to their firmware and logbook software on their web
site. It is nice to seem them adding features such as the interval
training. Perhaps they will continue to improve the Forerunner
firmware. They could focus on improving the flexibility if the
Interval Training feature and get rid of that stop-triggers-a-lap bug
for starters.
The logbook software, which will run
only on a Windows PC (Windows 98 and up), is pretty basic. In
addition to the same stats that you get directly from the Forerunner
201 history menu, you also get a graph of your pace, elevation, and
the breadcrumbs of where you ran. There is also a text box where you
can enter notes. And that's it. You can't track running shoe usage,
label routes, edit mileage or run time, or add runs where you didn't
use the Forerunner. Garmin should fix these issues. If the Logbook
software is going to useful, runners need to be able to add runs to
the runs downloaded from the Forerunner. You won't always run with
the Forerunner and if you occasionally run on a treadmill, it would
be nice if you could manually enter that run into the log along with
the data downloaded from the Forerunner. Since the Forerunner isn't
perfect at measuring distance Garmin should allow runners to adjust
the run distance and time of downloaded runs to account for
inaccurate tracking.
Note from editor: The Garmin people rightly point out that the
logbook software is free. For most competing products, you pay a
considerable premium for logbook software and for hardware that
allows you to upload your running history to a PC.
[top]
How well does it work?
Pretty darn well most of the time, but
there are some notable exceptions.
If you are running on the road with a
clear view of the sky and occasionally turn at intersections, then
the Forerunner is a great tool. It will be pretty accurate at
measuring your distance and your average pace. (If you read all the
previous detail you will remember that the Forerunner's measuring of
your current pace fluctuates a lot but averages out to being pretty
close.) On repeated runs through neighborhood streets, the
Forerunner will mark the miles at the same place on each run, give or
take 5 yards.
On winding roads and especially on
winding trails, you will have less luck. The Forerunner frequently
cuts corners even when you don't, which will cause it to record less
mileage than you actually travel. On a particularly curved bit if
trail our test model was off by as much as 5%. Of course that means
you are actually traveling 5% faster than the Forerunner reports.
This problem is amplified if you are running in wooded terrain. We
experienced this problem even before the leaves came out on the
trees.
This problem is especially apparent if
you use the navigation feature while running out-and-back on a curvy,
wooded trail. The Forerunner appears to be making estimates about
your pace and trajectory at various times, perhaps when it doesn't
have a good view of the GPS satellites. This can cause your return
path, as displayed on the Forerunner, to make figure-eights with your
outbound path. This happens even when the Forerunner is not
displaying any weak signal warnings.
In spite of this weakness, the
Forerunner 201 is still a very accurate tool as long as you don't do
most of your running on wooded trails or roads. If you do run on
wooded trails or roads, then you may want to consider the Nike® Triax V10
Speed & Distance Monitor or the Polar® Speed, Distance, and HR Training Monitor.
You can Find Your Perfect Fit, Guaranteed (or check for other discounts)
on both these items at
Road Runner Sports.
Here in Vermont, where the Forerunner
was tested, there aren't many skyscrapers around so
we can't report on how well the Forerunner would work in a large
city. There have been some reports, however, that all GPS units have
a tough time getting a signal when surrounded by tall buildings.
The Forerunner also does a poor job of
measuring altitude and consequently it does a poor job of measuring
incline. In fact the altitude feature is of little value given it's
inaccuracies. So if altitude and incline are important to you, you
may want to get a GPS unit that is more focused on hiking than
running.
[top]
< < Previous Page
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
Next Page> >
The Garmin Forerunner 201 is available at: